Ke, Y; Hao, W; Ding, H and Wang, Y (2017) Factors influencing the private involvement in urban rail public-private partnership projects in China. Construction Economics and Building, 17(1), pp. 90-106. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Private investors have been encouraged to participate in the development and operation of urban rail projects in China through Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs), given the fact that subnational governments are suffering from urgent development demands and severe fiscal pressure. However, there is no formal assessment to determine the private involvement in a PPP project. This problem is particularly critical in the sector of urban rail, in which the huge investment cannot rely on the private sector alone. This study hence aimed to uncover and identify the influencing factors. Multiple research methods, including content analysis, case study and focus group discussion were adopted to achieve the research purpose. Seven types of influencing factors were identified, including project financial model, government fiscal commitment, risk allocation, public accountability, efficiency considerations, policy and regulations, and organisational marketing strategies. The findings add to the current knowledge base by uncovering the drivers behind private involvement in a PPP project. They are also beneficial for industry practitioners as a basis/checklist to determine the private involvement.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | private involvement; procurement; public private partnership; urban rail. |
| Index terms: | accountability, public private partnership, railway construction, private sector, partnership, content analysis, strategy, China, commitment, focus group, marketing, case study, regulation, practitioner, risk allocation, knowledge base, influencing factor, investor, efficiency |
| Subjects: | practitioner, financial risk, Geography, business, civil engineering, performance management, data collection methods, management, risk assessment, liability law, information systems, political science, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, industry analysis, sociology, psychology, partnership management |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Procurement, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here