Thomson, C; Mickovski, S and Orr, C (2014) Promoting double loop learning in flood risk management in the Scottish context. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014, Portsmouth, UK.
Abstract
In Scotland, flood risk is predicted to double by 2100 due to climate change and land use changes within river basins. Flood Risk Management (FRM) has emerged as a strategic framework to encourage resilience through collaboration, risk assessment and flood plans designed to target investment for prevention and defence schemes. Learning in this context has often been criticised for being single loop, reactive, narrow, and fragmented and ignoring wider socio-technical issues. The Scottish Flood Risk Management Act (2009) has shifted focus from flood defence to a holistic prevention based approach which encourages the double loop learning (DLL) necessary to promote sustainability and greater resiliency within the social system. This research explores the extent FRM in Scotland has promoted DLL at both a strategic and project levels following the application of the 2009 Act. A literature review identifies that to promote DLL requires FRM to be proactive, seek new knowledge, be creative, question, and be holistic when making future based decisions. These characteristics were considered in two research phases, 1) a survey of Scottish local authorities (response from 22 of 32) in 2011, supplemented by stakeholder interviews focused on the strategic level and 2) follow up stakeholder interviews in 2014, and case study exploring operational implications at a project level. The research found that changes in FRM since 2009 have provided a framework where DLL can potentially flourish but this is a transitional phase with social-technical barriers restricting its delivery in practice at both strategic and project levels. Findings stress the importance of fostering a proactive and learning culture surrounding FRM which supports the management of explicit and tacit knowledge between strategic and project levels maximising opportunity for DLL during and post flood events, but also in identifying and managing individual projects.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | flood risk management; double loop learning; knowledge management; case study |
| Index terms: | social system, prevention, literature review, knowledge management, survey, risk assessment, land use, climate change, tacit knowledge, flood risk management, Scotland, interview, collaboration, river basins, case study, local authority, socio-technical |
| Subjects: | climate science, social theory, professional development, data analysis and analytics, management, financial risk, Geography, data collection methods, sociology, environmental engineering, research methods, real estate economics |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Information Management, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Organizational Design, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here