Bui, Diep Thi (2018) Improving the decision-making process for demolition waste management in urban redevelopment projects in Vietnam. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Abstract
The management of demolition waste in urban redevelopment projects is a major challenge requiring an integrative approach. This research demonstrates that multi-criteria decision analysis can improve and enable the demolition waste management decision-making process toward more sustainable urban redevelopment in Vietnam. This work has implications in assessing and qualifying demolition waste to more effectively achieve project cost and planning objectives in Vietnam.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Rose, Timothy and Skitmore, Martin |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision-making framework; decision support system; demolition waste; urban redevelopment; waste management; GIS-based model; framework for demolition waste management; supporting database; Vietnam |
| Index terms: | multi-criteria decision analysis, urban redevelopment project, decision-making process, database, demolition waste, decision-making, waste management, management decision, project cost, Vietnam, urban redevelopment, decision support |
| Subjects: | post-disaster and reconstruction, economics, decision analysis, data management, waste management, decision-making and reasoning, economic development, Geography |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here