Development of a methodology to quantify installation damage on geotextile for coastal application

Cheah, Charmaine Yi Ting (2017) Development of a methodology to quantify installation damage on geotextile for coastal application. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.

Abstract

This study was a step forward in enhancing the knowledge to quantify installation damage on geotextiles' properties for coastal protection structures. It examines the geotextiles' properties with the Drop Rock Test developed, which replicates construction stress on geotextile during installation process. The thesis investigated the influence of construction stress on geotextiles' robustness, mechanical strength, physical deformation, and filtration properties. The influence of subgrade characteristics (i.e moisture condition) on geotextiles' robustness during installation was examined in this study as well. Design charts to predict the robustness of geotextile during installation was developed which allows engineers and designers to select the appropriate geotextile to minimize the risk of damage during installation process.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Gallage, Chaminda; Dawes, Les and Kendall, Preston
Uncontrolled Keywords: coastal protection structure; drop rock test; geosynthetics; geotextiles; installation damage; filtration properties; impact resistance; hydraulic efficiency; cbr puncture resistance
Index terms: methodology, deformation, hydraulic, geotextile, efficiency, mechanical strength, designer, engineer
Subjects: materials science, research methods, profession, fluid mechanics, performance management, material properties and characteristics
Topics: Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here