Cheung, Yan Ki Fiona (2011) Relationship management as a strategy for supply chain engagement in the civil engineering construction industry. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Abstract
Many studies into construction procurement methods reveal evidence of a need to change the culture and attitude in the construction industry, transition from traditional adversarial relationships to cooperative and collaborative relationships. At the same time there is also increasing concern and discussion on alternative procurement methods, involving a movement away from traditional procurement systems. Relational contracting approaches, such as partnering and relationship management, are business strategies that align the objectives of clients, commercial participants and stakeholders. It provides a collaborative environment and a framework for all participants to adapt their behaviour to project objectives and allows for engagement of those subcontractors and suppliers down the supply chain. The efficacy of relationship management in the client and contractor groups is proven and well documented. However, the industry has a history of slow implementation of relational contracting down the supply chain. Furthermore, there exists little research on relationship management conducted in the supply chain context. This research aims to explore the association between relational contracting structures and processes and supply chain sustainability in the civil engineering construction industry. It endeavours to shed light on the practices and prerequisites for relationship management implementation success and for supply sustainability to develop. The research methodology is a triangulated approach based on Cheung.s (2006) earlier research where questionnaire survey, interviews and case studies were conducted. This new research includes a face-to-face questionnaire survey that was carried out with 100 professionals from 27 contracting organisations in Queensland from June 2008 to January 2009. A follow-up survey sub-questionnaire, further examining project participants. perspectives was sent to another group of professionals (as identified in the main questionnaire survey). Statistical analysis including multiple regression, correlation, principal component factor analysis and analysis of variance were used to identify the underlying dimensions and test the relationships among variables. Interviews and case studies were conducted to assist in providing a deeper understanding as well as explaining findings of the quantitative study. The qualitative approaches also gave the opportunity to critique and validate the research findings. This research presents the implementation of relationship management from the contractor.s perspective. Findings show that the adaption of relational contracting approach in the supply chain is found to be limited; contractors still prefer to keep the suppliers and subcontractors at arm.s length. This research shows that the degree of match and mismatch between organisational structuring and organisational process has an impact on staff.s commitment level and performance effectiveness. Key issues affecting performance effectiveness and relationship effectiveness include total influence between parties, access to information, personal acquaintance, communication process, risk identification, timely problem solving and commercial framework. Findings also indicate that alliance and Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) projects achieve higher performance effectiveness at both short-term and long-term levels compared to projects with either no or partial relationship management adopted.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Kajewski, Stephen and Rowlinson, Stephen |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | relationship management; commitment; communication; performance effectiveness; sustainability |
| Index terms: | mismatch, business strategy, relational contracting, evidence, access to information, subcontractor, early contractor involvement, strategy, variance, commitment, Queensland, procurement method, contracting organization, relationship management, questionnaire, qualitative approach, problem solving, risk identification, history, movement, dimension, interview, effectiveness, construction procurement, multiple-regression, factor analysis, traditional procurement, statistical analysis, survey, critique, construction industry, partnering, face, research methodology, case study, implementation |
| Subjects: | research methods, financial risk, health monitoring assessment and metrics, evaluation and assessment methods, statistical analysis, health behaviours and lifestyles, psychology, social equity, data science, business, management, engineering problems, industry analysis, performance management, architectural and construction history, practitioner, Geography, measurement and scaling, partnership management, research design and methodology, contractual arrangements, decision-making and reasoning, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Human Resources, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Ethics, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here