Dharmayanti, Gusti Ayu Putu Candra (2013) The impact of organisational culture in project selection process: Case of public infrastructure project in Indonesia. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Abstract
The thesis develops an Organisational Culture (OC) based framework for potentially improving the current practice of the infrastructure project selection process (PSP) in Indonesia, particularly for regional road projects. This framework is developed to address the suggestion emanating from the research that there is a need for strengthening the relevant organisational culture dimensions and making changes to current organisational culture profiles to support the effectiveness of the decision-making process of the current PSP. The findings not only benefit existing knowledge but also provide practical contributions for those decision-makers within the Indonesian regional government that are involved in PSP, i.e. by raising the awareness of the influence and the role of organisational culture.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Coffey, Vaughan and Trigunarsyah, Bambang |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | project selection; decision making; organisational culture; public infrastructure; roads projects |
| Index terms: | organizational culture, decision-making, strengthening, decision-making process, Indonesia, public infrastructure, dimension, infrastructure project, road project, project selection, effectiveness |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, Geography, infrastructure engineering, sociology, decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, performance management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, value management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Risk Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here