Nanang, Rustanto (2019) Development of asset optimisation strategy for the public sector in Indonesia. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Abstract
Asset optimisation strategy in the public sector is essential in the improvement of public service delivery. It assists by resolving problems in asset management, such as a large number of unregistered and underutilised land and buildings, high costs of operation and maintenance, as well as lack of control in the improvement of asset performance. This research aims to develop a robust strategy for asset optimisation by utilising the balanced scorecard as a strategy tool. It examines key elements and alternatives of asset optimisation of public land and building. As a comprehensive approach, this thesis distilled practical aspects of asset management from certain countries and applied mixed method to evaluate not just explore the elements but also determination of prioritisation using Analytic Hierarchy Process. The framework of asset optimisation is validated and tested in the Directorate General of State Asset and Management as a model of public asset manager in Indonesia.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Susilawati, Connie and Goonetilleke, Ashantha |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asset optimisation; public sector; asset management; optimum asset management; robust asset management |
| Index terms: | Indonesia, public sector, service delivery, manager, balanced scorecard, strategy, mixed method, operation and maintenance, land, asset management |
| Subjects: | service delivery, performance measurement, maintenance engineering, Geography, management, asset management, real estate economics, practitioner, administrative law, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here