Framework for implementing design build project delivery system in road infrastructure in Indonesia

Parami Dewi, Anak Agung Diah (2013) Framework for implementing design build project delivery system in road infrastructure in Indonesia. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.

Abstract

The thesis provides a framework for potential implementation of the design-build (DB) project delivery system in road infrastructure projects in Indonesia. This framework proposed a structure of the hierarchy of factors promoting the potential implementation of the DB project delivery system and introduced ways to implement the DB project delivery system through level of hierarchical factors. These findings not only give benefit to the academic knowledge but also to the public officials in guiding them with regard to the priority of promoting factors in the process to implement the DB system.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Trigunarsyah, Bambang and Xia, Bo
Uncontrolled Keywords: design build project delivery system; promoting factor; Indonesian road infrastructure projects; Delphi study; interpretive structural model
Index terms: design build, Indonesia, Delphi method, infrastructure project, implementation, project delivery
Subjects: project delivery, data collection methods, infrastructure and transport systems, contractual arrangements, Geography
Topics: Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here