Sunarharum, Tri Mulyani (2016) Collaborative planning for disaster resilience: The role of community engagement for flood risk management. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Abstract
Rapid urbanisation, fragmented governance and recurrent flooding complicates resolution of DKI Jakarta’s chronic housing shortage. The purpose of this thesis is to re-frame planning decision-making through collaborative approach to address risks of flooding and to increase community resilience. This thesis found that in spite of strong policy frameworks underlying flood risk management strategies, there are opportunities for improvement of collaboration mechanisms in decision-making processes and in implementation of plans to strengthen disaster resilience. It also potentially widens participation in dialogues regarding the effectiveness of policies and plans for flood risk management in Indonesia and across equatorial mega-cities facing similar challenges.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Susilawati, Connie and Sloan, Mellini |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | flooding; collaborative planning; community engagement; disaster management; decision-making process; megacities; disaster resilience; Jakarta; flood risk management; developing country |
| Index terms: | flood risk management, flooding, decision-making, disaster management, Jakarta, Indonesia, collaboration, disaster resilience, decision-making process, effectiveness, housing, implementation, governance, community engagement, strategy, resolution, developing country, community resilience, urbanization, collaborative planning |
| Subjects: | construction type, business, decision analysis, urban planning, Geography, development economics, management, performance management, financial risk, climate science, conflict resolution, community and social dimensions, contractual arrangements, environmental hazards, social equity |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Business Strategy, International Construction, Organizational Design, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Quality Management, Geographical Context, Governance, Procurement, Cost Management, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here