Critical contractor selection factors for major projects

Watt, David (2012) Critical contractor selection factors for major projects. PhD thesis, University of New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

Tender evaluation and contractor selection for the delivery of major projects and services is acknowledged as a complex undertaking that embodies many uncertainties. The criteria used for making judgments about potential suppliers and their ability to deliver are varied and many, and often traded-off on the basis of multiple conflicting objectives and stakeholder values. The research investigated the contractor selection process to identify and establish the relative importance of common criteria used in an actual choice of contractor for major projects. The primary objective of the research is to advance the knowledge and understanding of Contractor Selection, with particular emphasis toward determining which factors (criteria) influence the choice of contractor. The research embodied two primary studies. The first included a literature review and exploratory survey to identify relevant criteria used in the evaluation of tenders and selection of contractors. All identified and reported criteria were reviewed and sorted into defined categories. The number of occurrences in each category was recorded and threshold tests then applied to determine the principal criteria used to evaluate tenders. From this, eight (8) principal criteria were identified. Findings indicate that the preferred criteria for evaluating tenders are those which provide a measure of a contractors' ability in terms of their management and technical capability, past experience and performance, reputation, and the proposed method of delivery or technical solution. The second study investigated the relative importance of the eight (8) criteria identified from the previous study, plus the criterion of cost or price using a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). The approach provided a statistical basis for generating Choice Sets, each of which described three alternatives in terms of all nine criteria, or attributes, but with different levels. A series of Multinomial Logit Models (MNL) were developed from two hundred twenty two (222) respondents to determine the influence each criterion has on the actual choice of Contractor. Results were statistically significant, indicating past performance, technical expertise, cost/price and project management expertise as the most important criteria in the actual choice of contractor. Organisational criteria, such as company experience and reputation were found to be considerably less important.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Kayis, Berman
Uncontrolled Keywords: tender evaluation; contractor selection; major projects; discrete choice models
Index terms: stakeholder value, multinomial, tender evaluation, relative importance, literature review, experiment, survey, project management, contractor selection, judgment, major project
Subjects: data collection methods, risk assessment, dispute resolution, participation process, data analysis and analytics, project management theory and practice, statistical analysis, strategic project management, tendering
Topics: Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Procurement, Risk Management, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here