Aminbakhsh, A and Sonmez, R (2015) Pareto oriented optimization of discrete time-cost trade-off problem using particle swarm optimization. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 31st Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2015, Lincoln, UK.
Abstract
In project scheduling, it is feasible to reduce the duration of a project by allocating additional resources to its activities. However, crashing the project schedule will impose additional costs. Numerous research has focused on optimizing the trade-off between time and cost to achieve a set of non-dominated solutions. However, the majority of the research on time-cost trade-off problem developed methods for relatively simple problems including up to eighteen activities, which are not representing the complexity of real-life construction projects. In this work a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) technique is presented for Pareto oriented optimization of the complex discrete time-cost trade-off problems. The proposed PSO engages novel principles for representation and position-updating of the particles. The performance of the PSO is compared to the existing methods using a well-known 18-activity benchmark problem. A 63-activity problem is also included in computational experiments to validate the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed PSO for a more complex problem. The results indicate that the proposed method provides a powerful alternative for the Pareto front optimization of DTCTPs.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Pareto front; particle swarm optimization; project scheduling; time-cost trade-off problem |
| Index terms: | duration, time-cost trade-off, complexity, construction project, effectiveness, crashing, experiment, efficiency, project scheduling |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, quantity surveying, performance management, production management, project controls, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here