Cancian, Glen A (2016) Heuristic based optimisation of pavement management scheduling. PhD thesis, Griffith University, Australia.
Abstract
The issue of effectively scheduling pavement maintenance and rehabilitation treatments over a multi-year planning horizon plagues road authorities around the world with the significance of this issue being amplified by both an ageing pavement network and the trend towards insufficient fund allocation. The scope of the problem can be quantified as follows: if only a single treatment is able to be applied to each individual road segment in a single year, then the total number of possible programmed maintenance and rehabilitation schedule alternatives for a moderate-sized network of 1,000 road segments, with eight different treatments possible, over a twenty year anaysis period is ((1.0 × 103)8)20 = 1.0 × 10480. Assuming that a computer can build and evaluate 100 complete maintenance and rehabilitation schedules a second, to identify the optimal schedule for this 1,000 segment road network would take 3.17 × 10471 years. The overall goal of this study is to investigate the benefits of applying modern heuristic optimisation techniques to the problem of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation scheduling over a multi-year planning horizon. To address this goal, a four stage approach was utilised using a real road network with real pavement condition data as the test benchmark.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Pullan, Wayne and Chai, Wing |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | pavement maintenance; road maintenance; heuristic optimisation; scheduling; pavement rehabilitation; road networks; Australia |
| Index terms: | heuristic, fund allocation, optimization technique, Australia, scheduling, pavement maintenance and rehabilitation |
| Subjects: | Geography, algorithms, maintenance engineering, economic analysis, operations research, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Time Control, Geographical Context, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here