Stapelberg, Rudolph Frederick (2004) Methodology for determining the integrity of process engineering design. PhD thesis, Griffith University, Australia.
Abstract
In the past decade, Australian industry, and particularly the mining industry, has witnessed the development of several large "super-projects", most in excess of a billion dollars. These large super-projects include the exploitation of Australia's mineral wealth in alumina, copper, iron, nickel, uranium, and zinc, through the construction of huge complex industrial process plant ranging in cost from one to two billion dollars. Although these super-projects create many thousands of jobs resulting in significant decreases in unemployment especially during construction, as well as projected increases in the wealth and growth of the Australian economy, they bear a high risk in achieving their forecast profitability through maintaining budgeted costs. Most of the super-projects have either exceeded their budgeted establishment costs, or have experienced operational costs far in excess of what was originally estimated in their feasibility prospectus scope. Some of the more significant contributors to the cost "blow-outs" experienced by these super-projects can be attributed to the complexity of their engineering design, both in technology and in the complex integration of systems, as well as a lack of meticulous project management.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Mohamed, Sherif and Loo, Yew-Chaye |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | process engineering design; engineering integrity; knowledge-based expert systems; mining industry; super-projects; Australia |
| Index terms: | expert system, integration, methodology, complexity, unemployment, profitability, mining, engineering design, copper, project management, exploitation, Australia, integrity |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, research methods, Geography, health safety and environment, design process, organizational analysis, data management, geotechnical engineering, systems engineering, management, traditional and composite building materials, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here