Menadue, Vanessa Rachel (2014) Green commercial office buildings: Environmental performance and user perceptions. PhD thesis, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Abstract
Buildings labelled as 'green' bring with them high expectations, particularly in the commercial office sector. It is commonly accepted that 'green' buildings are designed, constructed and operated with the specific objectives of efficient use of resources: energy, water and materials, reducing negative impact on the environment, and also provide comfortable and healthy internal environments which result in high levels of occupant satisfaction and related productivity. In theory these 'green' intentions are predicted to bring positive results; however, whether in reality this is always the case is open to question. Unfortunately research into how 'green' commercial office buildings are actually performing is limited due to the relatively recent nature of this building type and the private and restrictive culture of commercial building management. This research aims to determine whether commercial office buildings whose designs follow 'green' principles or have been assessed by a widely accepted environmental assessment tool are outperforming non green (or conventional) buildings in terms of their environmental performance, specifically in energy and water use and in their ability to provide occupant satisfaction. The research focuses on nine commercial office buildings located in the City of Adelaide, South Australia with approximately 135,000 m2 of net lettable floor area. The research was based on post occupancy evaluation involving evaluation of building design, energy (base building and tenancies) and water consumption, monitoring of the internal building environment including temperature, relative humidity and lighting levels, as well as surveying the building occupants to assess perceived thermal, visual and aural comforts, and also perceived health and productivity. Analyses took place in two stages with the first stage involving the analyses of the individual aspects and the second stage correlating these aspects to develop a model of user satisfaction for the assessment of green building performance. Results show that 'green' buildings are meeting only some of the initial expectations. For example the 'green' buildings demonstrated considerable energy savings; in most cases they consumed less than half of the energy of the conventional buildings. Tenancy energy use was, however, independent of the building and was influenced by the organisations' and occupants' requirements with the results showing that tenancies in the 'green' buildings had similar and in some cases higher energy consumption levels than the tenancies in the conventional buildings. The occupant satisfaction survey showed that 'green' buildings designed for a known occupant fared significantly better in all areas than 'green' buildings designed under speculative conditions which received similar responses in the areas of comfort, health and productivity to the non green buildings. Despite the expected improvements in the buildings claiming to be 'green', temperature in winter and summer, as well as lighting and noise problems remain the key issues for the occupants. Although being in a 'new' space can have a positive effect on occupants, it is evident from this research that in general, little improvement of occupant satisfaction is actually seen in 'green' buildings, with their open plan work spaces and large glazed facades in fact exacerbating problems for the occupants. This research is this first comprehensive independent study in Australia of green buildings where the holistic approach adopted in the study has refined the post occupancy evaluation methodology bringing together multiple aspects; building design, resource consumption, measurements of internal environments and occupant satisfaction, acknowledging that it is essential for all of these aspects to be optimised for the longevity of 'green' buildings. It is expected that the implementation of the concluding recommendations, particularly those related to thermal, aural and visual issues will lead to happier and healthier occupants, more effective green buildings and contribute t the sustainability of the built environment.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Soebarto, Veronica Irawati and Williamson, Terence John |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | green buildings; commercial office buildings; post occupancy evaluation; occupant satisfaction; performance assessment |
| Index terms: | green building, commercial building, methodology, user satisfaction, environmental assessment, relative humidity, water consumption, surveying, open plan, winter, survey, commercial office, occupant satisfaction, built environment, comfort, holistic approach, summer, energy consumption, monitoring, energy-saving, South Australia, performance assessment, energy use, implementation, resource consumption, tenancy, building design, environmental performance, Australia, productivity, post-occupancy evaluation |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, infrastructure and transport systems, design practice, management, energy systems, evaluation methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data collection methods, business, air quality, user-centered design, control systems, assessment methods, physical geography and landforms, sustainability assessment, research methods, design concepts, Geography, environmental resource management, contractual arrangements, property law, architectural design, construction type, client relations, environmental impact, climate science |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Procurement, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Site Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here