Musenero, Leah (2023) Development of an integrated framework for constructive dispute resolution in infrastructure public-private partnership projects. PhD thesis, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Abstract
Despite wide international acceptance of infrastructure public-private partnerships (PPPs), they are fertile ground for disputes because of their unique features such as numerous stakeholders with differing organisational values and lifecycle arrangement for project delivery, among others. At the same time, dispute resolution (DR) in infrastructure PPPs is inadequately addressed and inefficient DR systems are prevalent. This study therefore developed a framework for constructive DR in infrastructure PPPs by embedding behaviour of PPP project parties through the lens of the Dual Concern Theory (DCT). The research employed a mixed methods approach and found that some of the sources of disputes in infrastructure PPPs include unbalanced allocation and under-pricing of risks, political interference, breakdown of commercial relationships, among others. In addition, some of the issues affecting DR in infrastructure PPPs were highlighted as inadequate information sharing, poor communication and collaboration, inadequate monitoring and evaluation systems, among others. Some critical success factors for DR in infrastructure PPPs were determined such as neutrality of the mediator, flexibility of PPP project parties, confidence in the DR system, fairness by all parties, and speed of DR. As a step towards improving DR in infrastructure PPPs, collaborative means of DR were suggested. These can be achieved through exploring solutions that are acceptable to all parties, transparency and open communication, among others. A framework for constructive DR in infrastructure PPPs was also developed. Among other theoretical contributions, this research clarified the occurrence of disputes and their resolution in infrastructure PPPs through the lens of DCT. From a practical perspective, an empirical framework that can serve as a customisable reference point when issues arise on infrastructure PPP projects, was developed.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Baroudi, Bassam and Gunawan, Indra |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | dispute resolution; infrastructure public-private partnerships; conflict management; dual concern theory |
| Index terms: | partnership, project party, information sharing, fairness, resolution, project delivery, lifecycle, monitoring, organizational value, neutrality, pricing, mixed method, mediator, transparency, conflict management, dispute, collaboration, critical success factor |
| Subjects: | control systems, professional development, leadership, conflict resolution, ethical practice, dispute resolution, data collection methods, partnership management, sociology, project delivery, management, economic analysis, business, data exchange |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Project Management, Site Management, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Information Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here