Ainge, Judith Alison (2016) Walls of iron: Nineteenth century prefabricated iron buildings in Australia. PhD thesis, University of Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
This thesis explores the relationship between nineteenth century prefabricated iron buildings and the unique conditions that facilitated their use in Australian colonies. Nineteenth century prefabricated iron buildings form a significant but largely unrecognised part of the Australian built environment, particularly in terms of their contribution to the progressive development of remote areas of the continent. Initially imported from Britain during the mid-nineteenth century and, later, fabricated from imported iron components in Australia colonies, prefabricated iron buildings reflect a particular period in architectural history, when the technological and scientific advances of the Victorian era coincided with a period of rapid change in the settlement patterns of the Australian colonies. Within the thesis, a system of classifying prefabricated iron buildings has developed and used as a classificatory schema to examine the diverse range of building types and the multiple driving factors associated with their use in the Australian colonies. The innovative qualities of iron building components and their use in prefabricated iron buildings form a remarkable and important part of the story of nineteenth century advances in building technologies. In the rapidly expanding colonies of Australia, prefabricated iron buildings, not only provided a solution to the chronic shortage of building infrastructure, but also ushered in a new and exciting form of architecture.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australian; nineteenth century; prefabricated; iron; buildings |
| Index terms: | history, building technology, built environment, Australia, building component |
| Subjects: | architectural and construction history, infrastructure and transport systems, engineering systems, architectural elements, Geography |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here