Improving cost contingency estimation for infrastructure projects based on the impact of cost overrun causes of similar projects – illustration using Saudi Arabia survey data

Allahaim, Fahad Saud Abdulaziz (2015) Improving cost contingency estimation for infrastructure projects based on the impact of cost overrun causes of similar projects – illustration using Saudi Arabia survey data. PhD thesis, University of Sydney, Australia.

Abstract

Cost overrun on infrastructure projects is widespread and represents significant financial risks to stakeholders. Despite the progress made, there is a lack of research on the estimation of project cost contingencies, thus the main objectives is by taking into consideration the actual impact of the cost risk of similar projects, this thesis developed and validated a cost contingency estimation model. A survey of 160 project managers of infrastructure projects in Saudi Arabia was conducted to elicit the cost overrun causes. After cluster analysis, the causes were reduced to four dimensions: scope changes, market and regulatory, inadequate planning and control, and unforeseen circumstances. These four dimensions were then used to develop a risk-based cost contingency estimation model (RBCCEM) to improve the accuracy of cost forecasting and then validated using a bootstrapping approach. The accuracy of cost estimation measures were used to compare RBCCEM with fixed cost contingency (10%), reference class forecasting (RCF P50 & P90), and hybrid (combination of RBCCEM & RCF P50). The contributions of this study are; first, it contributes to the research on the cost overrun causes by updating the existing knowledge of cost overrun causes to better understand the complexity of these causes and to manage risk effectively. Second, the results show that RBCCEM produces contingency estimates that are more consistent and brings project costs closer to actual costs than alternative approaches, such as RCF and hybrid. Moreover, this study contributes to knowledge by introducing a new way of modelling the cost contingency of projects using the cost overrun causes of similar infrastructure projects and providing empirical comparisons of cost overrun outcomes with those using alternative estimation methods. Together, this study provides important theoretical and managerial insights and opens the way for more research within the cost overrun context, particularly with regard to cost contingency estimation in large projects.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost overrun; cost overrun causes; infrastructure projects; typology; cost contingency estimation
Index terms: accuracy, survey, project cost, cost estimating, actual cost, scope change, complexity, cluster analysis, estimation, cost overrun, cost forecasting, forecasting, Saudi Arabia, project manager, infrastructure project, dimension, estimate, modelling
Subjects: Geography, analytical methods, scope management, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, economics, professional development, health monitoring assessment and metrics, prediction and forecasting, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics, profession, data collection methods
Topics: Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here