Bashirzadeh Tabrizi, Toktam (2019) Towards a simplified LCA tool: Minimising the life cycle environmental impact at the early stages of building design. PhD thesis, University of Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
Minimising the direct and indirect environmental impact of buildings over their life cycle has become a growing concern worldwide. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been effective in addressing this goal. However, it is constrained by several factors. First, little-detailed information to calculate LCA is available at the early stages of building design when the most important decisions are made. Second, the LCA method is too complex to apply at this stage, both in terms of the knowledge required to operate the conventional calculation software and for the inputs. Streamlining the LCA application at the early design phase has been hampered by the lack of reliable, available, comparable and consistent information on the life cycle environmental performance of buildings. Most of the previous LCA studies are based on a quantification method that requires the use of complex tools and an enormous amount of data and is best employed when the building is complete. The time and expense involved in this type of analysis make it unfeasible for small or individual projects. This thesis is the first step toward the development of a tool that allows designers to employ LCA in the early design stages of a building. It aims to allow designers to more easily apply the logic of LCA by minimising data requirements and identifying the most effective parameters that promise to make the most difference. A review of relevant literature has further identified the external criteria that are most closely associated with the effectiveness of LCA, namely: climate, location, building type and building lifetime. These parameters have been used to define a system boundary for generating results that reflect the characteristics of a specific building. Common rules have been extracted from the results of previous LCA studies of building envelopes and classified in relation to the most effective external criteria. The process shows that the results of quantitative LCA provide a ready-to-use database.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | life cycle assessment; early design stages; most effective parameters; life cycle environmental performance; time and cost effective tool |
| Index terms: | life cycle assessment, environmental impact, quantification, building design, environmental performance, streamlining, life cycle, designer, database, design phase, effectiveness, building envelope, early design stage |
| Subjects: | data management, measurement and scaling, management, performance management, profession, value management, sustainability assessment, architectural elements, design process, professional practice, architectural design, environmental impact |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Project Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here