Heredia Rojas, Boris Fabrizio (2017) The contingent effects of value creation processes on project value: An empirical analysis from project managers' perspective. PhD thesis, University of Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
Projects are seen as platforms for bringing changes that may create value for stakeholders. There are two main schools of thought on the value creation processes; one based on transactional exchange theories and the other on relations-based theories. The former focus on value creation through reduction of transactional costs, while the latter emphasises addressing project stakeholder's needs through establishing close interactions with involved parties. Accordingly, this research examines effects on project value of the two value creation processes for project delivery: independent value creation– where the firm relies on its capabilities and expertise to deliver the project, without the need for seeking collaboration from other firms; and value co-creation– where the firm and key stakeholders collaborate to deliver the project based on close relationships. Extant studies have conceptually identified the effects on project value of both value creation processes. Nevertheless, there is a little empirical investigation of these effects. Hence, the main objective of this research is to investigate how both processes of value creation affect project value and the moderating effects of two critical contingent variables –requirements uncertainty and project complexity– on the relationship between value creation processes and project value. The study employs a deductive approach to fulfil this aim, and applies a cross-sectional survey to collect data; 168 valid responses from Chilean project managers were returned. A multivariate analysis using PLS-SEM was conducted to validate the conceptual framework and to test the hypotheses. Contributing to literature, the findings demonstrate that both value creation processes impact jointly on project value, and these impacts are moderated by the current level of requirements uncertainty and project complexity. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed. Directions for future research are elaborated.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | value creation processes; project value; project complexity; requirements uncertainty; moderating effects; partial least square-structural equation modelling |
| Index terms: | investigation, interaction, project delivery, project manager, platform, value co-creation, collaboration, project stakeholder, value creation, partial least square, conceptual framework, project complexity, multivariate analysis, structural equation modelling, survey |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, sociology, management, project delivery, value management, profession, data collection methods, behavioral psychology, digital design, organizational theory, economic development, theoretical framing |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Procurement, Project Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here