A project management framework for enhanced productivity performance using building information modelling

Liao, L; Teo, E A L and Low, S P (2017) A project management framework for enhanced productivity performance using building information modelling. Construction Economics and Building, 17(3), pp. 1-26. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

Although the Singapore government has mandated submissions of building plans in building information modelling (BIM) format since July 2013, this does not yet seem to lead to enhanced productivity performance. BIM collaboration between designers and downstream contractors appears to remain inadequate. While many studies have been conducted on using BIM for better project outcomes, studies that relate BIM with the identification of non-value adding activities in the project lifecycle and the reduction of the resulting wastes are at infancy stage. This paper aims to propose a project management framework for enhancing the productivity of building projects in Singapore, which forms Phase I of an ongoing research project. A two-pronged approach is presented. Firstly, non-value adding activities in the current project delivery process that uses BIM partially in Singapore are identified by comparing the typical current process with full BIM-based processes; such activities are cut down after process transformation in terms of people, process, and technology. Secondly, time savings derived from reducing the wastes caused by these activities are quantified. The proposed framework was validated by a case study of a local residential project. It was concluded that this framework provides a valuable tool for project teams to enhance productivity performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: BIM; non; process transformation; productivity; wastes; value adding activities
Index terms: time saving, case study, collaboration, building information modelling, residential project, Singapore, project team, project management, project outcome, project delivery, designer, transformation, project lifecycle, productivity
Subjects: information systems, time analysis, project delivery, data collection methods, management, economic development, profession, business, project completion, Geography, project management theory and practice
Topics: Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Time Control, Urban Studies, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here