Co-creating urban transformation: A stakeholder analysis for germany's heat transition

Heger, P; Bieber, C; Hendawy, M and Shooshtari, A (2025) Co-creating urban transformation: A stakeholder analysis for germany's heat transition. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 1046-1060. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

This study analyses a real-world experiment (RWE) on heat transition in the urban context of a city–university partnership in Bochum, Germany, highlighting the theoretical foundations, methodological design and practical challenges of transdisciplinary research. Informed by concepts of transdisciplinarity and RWEs, the study situates RWEs as hybrid infrastructures linking scientific enquiry with societal transformation. Transdisciplinarity is conceptualised as a reflexive and integrative principle that fosters reciprocal learning between academic, municipal and civic actors. The research applies the Three-Circle Model of actor involvement as a heuristic to map the evolving, and over time changing, roles of stakeholders. The study employs participatory observation, ethnographic field notes, document analysis and informal interviews. The findings reveal how RWEs function as relational infrastructures that balance experimental rigor with public accessibility, while navigating challenges such as power asymmetries, participation myths and institutional constraints. By embedding agile methods and low-threshold participation formats into everyday urban settings, RWEs emerge as sites of co-creation, democratic innovation and iterative learning. The study offers practical guidance for designing inclusive, transdisciplinary experiments that bridge theory and practice in urban transformation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building stock; citizen participation; co-production; Germany; heat transition; living labs; stakeholder analysis, sustainability transitions; wärmewende
Index terms: interview, building stock, stakeholder analysis, experiment, co-production, citizen participation, Germany, accessibility, heuristic, partnership, document analysis, transformation, foundations, co-creation
Subjects: innovation studies, design process, Geography, inclusive design, structural engineering, asset management, business, data collection methods, risk assessment, data science, participation process, partnership management
Topics: Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here