Jalaei, F; Zhang, J; McNeil- Ayuk, N and McLeod, C (2025) Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) for design of climate-resilient bridges-a comprehensive review and a case study. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(1), pp. 99-114. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The life cycle assessment (LCA) study of a bridge and bridge network would provide the environmental profile and hotspot information including the GHG emission of different life stages, among the components. Compared with a rapid adoption of Road LCA into the procurement process in the developed countries, Bridge LCA however remains a nascent area where a few studies conducted in North America. The critical issues of environmental profile, hotspots and benchmarks of bridges remain a challenge due to the complexity of bridge structures, data collection and unfamiliarity of LCA in the bridge community. To address the challenge, this study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis and review regarding life cycle environmental impacts assessment of bridge projects around the world to identify the research pattern in order to capture the areas of research needed inside this theme. As a proof of concept, this study continues with conducting an LCA case study of a Bridge Replacement Project on a Canadian signature highway, demonstrating the adoption of the LCA methodology and a framework to streamline the collection of data, to develop, present, and interpret the environmental impacts, in terms of the durability and service life of the bridge asset. The study found that stainless steel rebar decks outperformed black steel decks in terms of CO2 reduction by over 10%, with transport fleet impacts being a significant part of the bridge's overall environmental impact, highlighting the need for diverse functional units in bridge life cycle assessment studies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bibliometric analysis; bridge durability design; bridge projects; life cycle assessment; service life infrastructure |
| Index terms: | complexity, replacement, developed country, environmental impact, methodology, bibliometric analysis, life cycle assessment, procurement process, bridge project, rebar, durability, life cycle, CO2 emissions, case study, service life, critical issue |
| Subjects: | material degradation and durability, building materials, value management, risk assessment, data collection methods, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, research evaluation and metrics, contractual arrangements, climate science, materials science, environmental impact, asset management, development economics, research methods |
| Topics: | Procurement, Sustainability, Risk Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Business Strategy, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here