Reconstruction in post-war Rome: Transnational flows and national identity

Jiang, J (2026) Reconstruction in post-war Rome: Transnational flows and national identity. Buildings & Cities, 7(1), pp. 215-231. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

After the Second World War, Rome became a site of crossing populations, migrations, returns, transitions, and cultural convergence and divergence. Within this fluid landscape, the city's reconstruction was shaped by transnational flows and the complexities of multilevel governance, with actors operating across international, national and local levels. How did multilevel governance shape decision-making in the reconstruction of war-damaged monuments? How did destruction generate opportunities to redefine heritage beyond the paradigm of loss? This study examines how these interactions influenced both the reconstruction methodologies and the evolving meaning of heritage, highlighting heritage as a form of governance. Drawing on archival sources, visual documentation and focused case studies, this paper demonstrates that tangible reconstruction efforts were closely entwined with the process of national identity formation in the aftermath of trauma and conflict. A consciousness of heritage emerged as a shared international patrimony, understood as belonging to all civilisations and mobilised for fundraising and cultural diplomacy across national borders. This heritage diplomacy illuminates the complex networks of institutions, funding mechanisms and competing notions of sovereignty that have shaped modern conservation and reconstruction. By tracing how cultural entanglements shaped heritage practices, critical insights arise for contemporary debates on post-conflict reconstruction, identity and urban resilience.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architectural heritage; cities; cultural identity; disaster reconstruction; Italy; post-conflict; reconciliation; Rome; transnational governance
Index terms: conservation, population, monument, governance, Rome, meaning, consciousness, decision-making, funding, post-conflict reconstruction, Italy, case study, interaction, identity, war, methodology, documentation, reconstruction, migration, drawing, urban resilience, complexity, paradigm
Subjects: sociology, environmental policy, economic analysis, decision analysis, building construction, human factors and perception, behavioral psychology, business, Geography, research methods, technical documentation, systems engineering, demography, architectural elements, conflict and crisis studies, sustainability and resilience, education and knowledge transfer, post-disaster and reconstruction, professional development, data collection methods
Topics: Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Design Practice, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Business Strategy, Governance, Information Management, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here