Bridging the information gap using targeted digital transformation: Process mapping large-scale concrete activity

White, C; Lees, J M and MacAskill, K (2026) Bridging the information gap using targeted digital transformation: Process mapping large-scale concrete activity. Building Research & Information, 54(1), pp. 24-43. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

An information gap exists in the construction industry, where stakeholders possess information that is not effectively shared or sufficiently detailed. The information gap increases uncertainty in decision-making processes, leading to design conservatism, project delays and errors. Reducing over-design and waste in concrete practice is critical to achieving greater sustainability. Bridging the information gap, therefore, supports sustainable change and can be reinforced by digital transformation that aids information availability. Nevertheless, the complexity and current ambiguity in the information requirements of stakeholders in the supply chain pose a substantive challenge to effective implementation. To this end, this study develops a process flow model for the concrete sector constructed using a mixed method approach of a questionnaire, interviews, and an industry workshop. The information requirements and actions of all stakeholders in the system are collectively mapped for the first time. By developing process understanding, the model demonstrates that the current document-centric approach adopted by the sector contributes to the information gap. Furthermore, the developed process understanding aids in targeted digital transformation to tackle the information gap in practice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: concrete supply chain; digital transformation; digitalization; information gap; process flow model
Index terms: implementation, concrete supply, construction industry, workshop, mixed method, decision-making process, transformation, mapping, questionnaire, project delay, complexity, interview, digitalization
Subjects: spatial and geospatial analysis, digital technology, contractual arrangements, construction type, decision analysis, project controls, systems engineering, industry analysis, business, data collection methods, construction logistics
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Procurement, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here