Luo, Z; Jiang, Y; Li, X; Wu, R and Pan, H (2026) Financing mode selection and key success factors in area comprehensive development projects based on if-multimoora. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(4): 04026032, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Area comprehensive development projects represent a critical model for accelerating urbanization and fostering industry–city integration. However, such projects face challenges, including extended development cycles, substantial capital investments, incomplete legal frameworks, and financing difficulties, compounded by diverse applicability of available investment and financing modes that heighten the risk of project failure. Previous studies predominantly focused on standalone projects; this study proposes an intuitionistic fuzzy multiobjective optimization by ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form (IF-MULTIMOORA) method for group decision-making on financing model selection and key success factor (KSF) prioritization. To address this, this study first identifies 20 KSFs through a literature review and the Delphi method, categorizing them into four dimensions: government policies, external environmental factors, project intrinsic factors, and social investor factors. Subsequently, the IF-MULTIMOORA method is applied to evaluate the applicability of three common financing modes, namely, public–private partnership (PPP), social investor + engineering procurement construction (EPC), and the market-oriented operation model, and assess KSF importance in the LinYi (LY) Area Comprehensive Development Project. The results indicated that the social investor + EPC mode demonstrates the highest applicability, and the five most critical KSFs are social investor's participation in preliminary planning, project investment recovery status, project revenue distribution, land supply plan compatibility, and social investor's urban comprehensive operation experience. This study constructs a decision-making model integrating the ranking of KSFs with financing mode selection and validates its feasibility through the LY Area Comprehensive Development Project, aiming to anticipate and mitigate potential risks leading to project failure and to improve resource utilization at the decision-making stage.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | area comprehensive development; intuitionistic fuzzy multiobjective optimization by ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form; investment risk decision-making; key success factors |
| Index terms: | environmental factor, financing, decision-making, integration, face, literature review, success factor, revenue, capital investment, land, dimension, government policy, partnership, ratio analysis, Delphi method, investor, recovery, resource utilization, urbanization, project failure |
| Subjects: | sociology, decision analysis, organizational analysis, partnership management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data analysis and analytics, real estate economics, data collection methods, economic analysis, site logistics, environmental science, operations management, public policy, urban planning, psychology, project completion |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Site Management, Organizational Design, Project Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here