Amenity preferences and design evaluation in Australian build-to-rent compact apartments: A VR/EEG study

Carvalho, R; Zhang, F; Liu, T; Yu, R; Chen, E and Oh, E (2026) Amenity preferences and design evaluation in Australian build-to-rent compact apartments: A VR/EEG study. Building Research & Information, 54(2), pp. 158-178. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Build-to-Rent (BTR) offers professionally managed, long-term rental housing addressing urban density challenges. While BTR's financial aspects are well-studied, spatial design impacts on tenant experience remain underexplored. This study examines how compact apartment design influences tenant wellbeing in Australia's subtropical, inner-suburban BTR developments. Focusing on BTR's core demographic, professionals aged 25–40 without children, we employed a mixed-methods approach. Phase 1 surveyed 43 Australians on amenity preferences, revealing priorities for cleanliness, security and privacy in shared facilities. Phase 2 used virtual reality (VR) and electroencephalography (EEG) to assess 20 Southeast Queensland participants' responses to five one-bedroom apartments (40 m2). Results demonstrate complex design-experience relationships. Apartments featuring biophilic and industrial elements or flexible configurations generated the highest positive affect and engagement. Conversely, units with minimal daylight, though meeting regulatory standards, triggered elevated stress and dissatisfaction. Critically, EEG revealed physiological stress responses invisible to self-reports, particularly where biophilic and industrial aesthetics conflicted, suggesting design coherence is essential for restorative effects. These findings establish that regulatory compliance alone fails to ensure tenant wellbeing in high-density housing. As Australian cities increasingly rely on BTR to address affordability pressures, evidence-based design incorporating experiential quality beyond minimum standards becomes crucial for tenant satisfaction and long-term market viability.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: build-to-rent; evidence-based design; experiential quality; pre-occupancy evaluation; tenant wellbeing
Index terms: biophilic, design evaluation, virtual reality, urban density, Australia, children, evidence-based design, aesthetic, satisfaction, density, housing, affordability, bedroom, preference, regulatory compliance, coherence, configuration, privacy, well-being, Queensland, tenant
Subjects: systems engineering, design incorporating nature, project delivery, mental health and wellbeing, virtual reality, design methods, demography, professional ethics, architectural elements, factor and component analysis, decision-making and reasoning, Geography, environmental policy, analytical methods, economic analysis, construction type, design assessment, practitioner, human factors and perception
Topics: Sustainability, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here