Zuo, W; Li, Q; Wang, Q; Qiao, S; Mei, T and Guo, Z (2026) Lego voxelization method for arbitrary building information models to support path planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(2): 04025239, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Building information models are widely used as data sources for indoor path planning, with many approaches employing grid cells or voxels to represent the indoor navigation environment. Among these, the LEGO voxelization method is particularly suitable for creating path-planning environments, as the generated LEGO voxels fit the components better than other voxelization methods. However, current LEGO-based voxelization methods, which rely on triangle normals, can be unreliable when processing models containing triangles with inconsistent vertex sequences. To address this limitation, this study proposes an improved LEGO voxelization method that eliminates the need for triangle normal data. Experimental results demonstrate that the method achieves an accuracy ratio of 95.33% to 99.96% across 12 test models and outperforms the current LEGO-voxelization method in various model formats. Additionally, it can voxelize large-scale models within a reasonable time. By streamlining the creation of cell-based environments, a traditionally time-consuming and tedious task, this method allows researchers and practitioners to focus more on path-planning research and applications.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; cell-based path planning; space discretization; voxelization |
| Index terms: | accuracy, practitioner, indoor navigation, streamlining, building information modelling |
| Subjects: | design practice, management, professional development, information systems, practitioner |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Information Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here