Kismet, B and Colakoglu, M B (2026) Developing a building-scale circularity indicator through fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and gini index-based circularity calculation methods. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(6), pp. 994-1016. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Circular economy (CE) aims to achieve sustainable development by optimizing resource efficiency through innovative system designs. The built environment plays a crucial role in this transition, yet the absence of standardized indicators hinders effective circularity assessment. This study introduces a structured building-scale circularity indicator (BuCI) to support industry and academia in evaluating buildings' circularity levels and facilitating the shift towards a circular built environment. Based on a thorough review of CE, the methodology involves the generation of a model, its implementation on a selected case study and evaluation. The proposed model integrates the shearing layer and building lifecycle concepts to establish a measurement framework with defined criteria and key performance indicators. Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and Gini index are used to formulate circularity calculation. Then, the BuCI is implemented on three different case studies, two steel and one reinforced concrete buildings. CS1 and CS2 reached 60% circularity level, thanks to the material advantages and certain design principles such as modularity, disassembly and flexibility, whereas CS3 calculated as 31.05% circular due to material and design decisions. The study contributes to the field by introducing a novel indicator for the industry, academia and authorities to accelerate the circular transition. For future studies, it is suggested to integrate cost and cultural heritage related criteria.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; circular economy; circularity assessment; indicator; sustainability |
| Index terms: | circular economy, circularity, case study, key performance indicator, future study, implementation, analytical hierarchy process, built environment, academia, lifecycle, resource efficiency, design principle, sustainable development, modularity, disassembly, design decision, reinforced concrete, methodology |
| Subjects: | health safety and environment, sustainable design, research methods, decision-making and optimization, sustainable materials, contractual arrangements, operations management, management, design practice, infrastructure and transport systems, design flexibility, educational institutions, design methods, research design and methodology, data collection methods, project delivery, building materials |
| Topics: | Project Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Procurement, Education, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here