Ye, K; Yaoliang, Z; Zhenhua, H and Bingzhen, L (2026) Collusive bidding in the construction industry: A systematic review of organizational forms, mechanisms and anti-collusion strategies. Building Research & Information, 54(3), pp. 378-392. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Collusive bidding, an illegal practice among contractors competing for construction contracts, presents a material impediment to sustainable industrial development. While the popularity of collusive bidding has attracted scholarly attention, previous studies have exhibited three distinctive limitations: ambiguous delineation of organizational forms, fragmented analysis of collusion mechanisms and inadequate evaluation of anti-collusion strategies. To address these gaps, a systematic review was conducted to examine the relevant literature on collusive bidding. Drawing on 106 articles (1990–2025), a comprehensive framework was derived: (1) classification of organizational forms, (2) integration of multidimensional mechanisms, and (3) systematic assessment of anti-collusion strategies. The review identified critical knowledge gaps in vertical collusion and state-corporate crime-related areas, while also highlighting shortcomings in current detection methods for collusive bidding, particularly in terms of their limited monitoring channels and time lag issues. By enhancing the theoretical understanding of collusive bidding, the study not only guides future research but also provides policymakers and industry practitioners with actionable interventions to deal with collusive bidding in the new era of digital transformation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | anti-collusion strategy; collusive bidding; construction business; mechanism; organizational forms; systematic review |
| Index terms: | monitoring, industrial development, systematic literature review, construction industry, drawing, construction contract, practitioner, strategy, collusive bidding, transformation, collusion, integration |
| Subjects: | tendering, control systems, practitioner, business, technical documentation, management, construction type, organizational analysis, industry analysis, contract type, research evaluation and metrics |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Site Management, Construction Technology, Procurement, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here