Proactive construction hazard prevention model using machine learning

Hsiao, W T; Yu, W D and Shih, C C (2026) Proactive construction hazard prevention model using machine learning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(2): 04025261, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction accidents are a major cause of occupational fatalities worldwide. While effective hazard prediction is crucial for preventing accidents, it remains challenging due to the lack of available data. This study introduces the proactive construction hazard prevention (PCHP) model, combining a construction hazard causation hierarchy (CHCH), a machine learning-based hazard prediction model (HPMB), a lessons learned file (LLF), and a proactive hazard prevention (PHP) module. Unlike traditional accident prediction models, the proposed PCHP model connects worksite attributes with lessons learned from previous hazard prevention cases, forming a proactive approach to hazard prevention that is unprecedented in the literature. The proposed model was tested on 5,071 hazard records from 114 construction sites. It demonstrated 92.3% accuracy for single-hazard predictions using the ensemble bagged trees mode, and 96.8% accuracy for the top five compound-hazard predictions using neural networks. This research contributes to advance construction safety management by: (1) validating machine learning's effectiveness in hazard prediction with unprecedented accuracy; (2) developing a novel method for predicting complex compound hazards previously unexplored in the literature; and (3) introducing a proactive model for implementing preventive measures before construction begins.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: compound hazards prediction; construction safety; hazard elimination; machine learning
Index terms: neural network, construction site, prediction model, accuracy, construction safety, machine learning, lessons learned, construction accident, fatalities, prevention, module, effectiveness
Subjects: prediction and forecasting, artificial intelligence, work location, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, professional development, performance management, health risk and incident analysis, financial risk, architectural elements
Topics: Sustainability, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Site Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here