Daoud, A O; KhairEldin, M; Ibrahim, A H and Toma, H M (2026) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for Egyptian residential construction waste prediction. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(6), pp. 1059-1077. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Construction waste (CW) significantly impacts environmental degradation, resource depletion, and construction costs, especially in rapidly developing regions. However, data on CW generation remain scarce in many developing countries, hindering effective waste management. This study presents an artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive model to estimate CW quantities—specifically, concrete, bricks, and steel—using a case study in Egypt. Data were collected from 25 construction sites, incorporating variables such as total area, design consistency, worker experience, and waste reuse. The model employs an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) to analyze the dynamic nature of construction activities and predict waste generation. Model accuracy was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and the a20-index. The concrete model achieved R2 = 0.95, RMSE = 0.077, MAE = 0.071, a20 = 0.500; the bricks model showed R2 = 0.96, RMSE = 0.063, MAE = 0.043, a20 = 0.400; and the steel model resulted in R2 = 0.93, RMSE = 0.044, MAE = 0.042, a20 = 0.500. The results demonstrate the model's potential to support data-driven waste estimation where data is limited. These findings can inform strategies and policies for CW management by enabling the forecasting of waste volumes during construction phases.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bricks; concrete; construction waste management; machine learning; steel |
| Index terms: | estimate, construction phase, Egypt, forecasting, construction activity, model accuracy, depletion, construction cost, construction site, waste generation, construction waste, machine learning, estimation, case study, strategy, mean square error, residential construction, effective waste management, fuzzy inference, artificial intelligence, developing country, environmental degradation |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, construction operations, work location, environmental resource management, financial and cost management, decision-making and optimization, probability and distributions, Geography, waste management, construction integration, environmental impact, artificial intelligence, prediction and forecasting, management, analytical methods, development economics, project delivery |
| Topics: | Project Management, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Site Management, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, International Construction, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here