Transfer learning for deep learning-based point cloud tasks in construction scenes

Yue, H; Wang, Q; Cui, L; Li, C; Fang, H and Cheng, J C P (2026) Transfer learning for deep learning-based point cloud tasks in construction scenes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(6): 04026058, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Deep learning (DL)-based point cloud processing has been widely applied to 3D reconstruction in the construction industry. However, DL methods typically require large, fully annotated data sets for effective learning, which can be time-consuming and labor-intensive to produce. This paper proposes a transfer learning method to improve the effectiveness of point cloud tasks for construction scenes. This paper investigates the performance of pretrained models across various DL tasks, algorithms, and transfer learning configurations, specifically fine-tuning and partial transfer learning, and evaluates them in three representative construction scenarios: underground garage data set (UGD); construction site data set (SITE); and pipe system network data set (PSNet). The results demonstrate the following: (1) pretraining on data sets from diverse construction environments improves the mean intersection over union by 8.7%, 8.3%, and 45% on UGD, SITE, and PSNet, respectively, with backbone-only pretraining achieving the best performance; (2) a moderate pretrained sample size combined with a larger training sample size achieves better pretraining results; and (3) pretraining can also improve the accuracy of instance segmentation and point completion.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: deep learning; point cloud; pre-training; semantic segmentation; transfer learning
Index terms: effectiveness, construction industry, reconstruction, sample size, deep learning, configuration, construction site, point cloud, accuracy
Subjects: artificial intelligence, work location, research design and methodology, systems engineering, industry analysis, professional development, performance management, building construction, digital design
Topics: Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here