Fan, C L (2026) Crack identification and severity analysis via computer vision: Comparative study of rgb and grayscale imagery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(3): 04026004, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Deep learning-based computer vision technology has become an effective tool for crack detection and segmentation, and it has considerable potential for application in infrastructure maintenance. Crack detection and segmentation are the two core steps in automated crack identification. The present study used RetinaNet to detect concrete cracks in RGB and grayscale images and then used three deep learning-based semantic segmentation models to segment the detected cracks: an edge-detection-based bidirectional cascade network (BDCN), a holistically nested edge detection (HED), and a multitask road extractor (MTRD) with a multitask learning framework. The results indicated that RetinaNet exhibited considerably higher crack detection performance on grayscale images than RGB images. In particular, it exhibited a precision of 1.0 under an intersection-over-union threshold of 0.1-0.3. Moreover, regression analysis revealed that the coefficient of determination (R2) for the correlation between crack direction and severity was 0.830, indicating that a crack's direction significantly affected its severity. The adopted segmentation models also performed better on grayscale images than on RGB images, with the accuracy rates of the MTRD and BDCN models for grayscale images being 0.996 and 0.982, respectively. Thus, grayscale processing can enhance crack identification. Practically, this approach can significantly improve the efficiency and reliability of infrastructure inspection and maintenance, enabling quicker identification and prioritization of critical structural repairs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cracks; digital images; grayscale processing; object detection; semantic segmentation |
| Index terms: | accuracy, computer vision, repair, object detection, inspection, deep learning, efficiency, regression analysis, comparative study |
| Subjects: | maintenance engineering, computer vision, quality assurance, performance management, professional development, statistical analysis, research design and methodology, artificial intelligence |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here