Jadidoleslami, S; Azizi, M; Sobhiyah, M and Zareravasan, A (2026) A cross-impact analysis of digital transformation factors in construction firms: A multilevel MICMAC analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(2): 04025243, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Digital transformation (DT) in construction firms faces complex, interdependent barriers across individual, organizational, and metaorganizational levels, slowing adoption in a competitive industry. Prior studies often examined isolated factors, offering limited guidance for achieving digital maturity. This study advances the body of knowledge by employing a multilevel matrix of cross-impact multiplications applied to classification (MICMAC) cross-impact analysis to identify and evaluate 18 key DT factors - derived from 46 initial factors via a literature review and expert interviews - and their interdependencies in construction firms. Through qualitative content analysis and MICMAC software, we identify critical drivers, such as organizational culture and metaorganizational economic conditions, while highlighting system instability driven by organizational readiness and management approaches. This systemic perspective reveals dynamic interactions among factors, addressing a critical gap in holistic DT strategies. The study contributes novel theoretical insights by mapping these dynamics, offering a predictive framework for practitioners to prioritize interventions. Construction firms can foster adaptive cultures, enhance individual digital skills, and advocate for supportive policies to navigate challenges and boost competitiveness. Moreover, this framework equips project managers and policymakers with actionable strategies to operationalize DT, while strengthening resilience and productivity in a technology-resistant sector.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; cross-impact matrix; digital transformation; disruptive technologies; fourth industry |
| Index terms: | interview, literature review, face, content analysis, strategy, construction firm, mapping, practitioner, strengthening, body of knowledge, impact analysis, organizational culture, project manager, economic condition, productivity, transformation, dynamics, competitiveness, construction industry, interaction |
| Subjects: | management, sociology, industry analysis, systems engineering, data collection methods, profession, business, data analysis and analytics, structural engineering, spatial and geospatial analysis, market analysis, behavioral psychology, organization, practitioner, psychology, knowledge management, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here