Gordo-Gregorio, P; Alavi, H; Edwards, D J; Forcada, N and Guéna, F (2026) An occupant-centric approach on digital twins for building management. Building Research & Information, 54(1), pp. 59-78. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Digitalization trends in building management increasingly emphasize the creation of Digital Twins (DTs) for building management but often neglect how occupants interact with these technologies. This paper aims to explore the functionalities of building management systems based on occupant interactions with DTs. To achieve this, occupant preferences are investigated through a questionnaire survey conducted with 106 respondents from two case studies. The survey investigated participants' interest in using DTs for various building management tasks, their familiarity with DTs and their demographic factors. Analysis results revealed that occupant's interest in DTs is not significantly influenced by their prior knowledge or gender. Instead, providing access to DTs increased their interest in areas beyond their job roles, particularly in aspects related to comfort and environmental management. Younger participants showed a heightened interest in using DTs for environmental and energy management issues. The study also suggests that promoting occupant interaction with DTs can enhance productivity and satisfaction. This paper underscores the need for additional research to integrate smart technologies into building management with a focus on occupant involvement. It highlights the potential of DTs to improve real-time monitoring and support sustainability initiatives and thus, offers a more inclusive and effective alternative to traditional management tools.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building management; digital twin; occupant-centric approach; questionnaire survey; sustainability |
| Index terms: | productivity, satisfaction, case study, environmental management, energy management, interaction, comfort, demographic factor, monitoring, survey, functionality, digitalization, building management, building management system, digital twin, preference, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | project delivery, sustainability and energy, control systems, mechanical systems, data collection methods, occupational health and safety management, management, design features, digital technology, digital engineering, behavioral psychology, demography, decision-making and reasoning, sustainability assessment |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Site Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here