Working at home: Tactics to reappropriate the home

Milián Bernal, D; Pelsmakers, S; Nisonen, E and Vanhatalo, J (2026) Working at home: Tactics to reappropriate the home. Buildings & Cities, 7(1), pp. 143-160. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

During industrialisation, work and home were mentally and physically divided. Nevertheless, homes are important workspaces. However, contemporary homes are not designed to accommodate work, and the home as a space of work has received scant attention from architectural scholarly work. How homeworkers navigate the spatial constraints of contemporary homes and create their workspaces remains underexplored. This paper investigates the tactics individuals in Finland employ to appropriate the home and create workspaces. It is based on a qualitative, in-depth multiple case study comprised of home visits, interviews, and visual and spatial documentation. Findings discuss three key tactics homeworkers employ to appropriate their home and create workspaces: positioning work at home; creating workspaces with objects; and by choreographing spaces into being with their bodies. Findings can inform the design of future homes as sites where dwelling and work intertwine and highlight the importance of planning highly qualitative indoor and outdoor environments to support all sorts of work at home. PRACTICE RELEVANCE Contemporary homes are not designed to accommodate work. This study explains why future housing design should consider the diversity of work conducted at home. A range of housing typologies is needed to accommodate different types of work and to enable the potential of all homes to become places of work. Adaptable homes have interior spaces that support work with proper considerations to storage space, adaptable physical boundaries as well as quality outdoor environments with different physical and social infrastructures.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptability; architecture; Finland; housing; inhabitants; planning; workhomes; working at home; working from home; workplace; workspace
Index terms: housing design, workspace, interview, housing, boundaries, case study, Finland, documentation, industrialization, adaptability
Subjects: Geography, construction type, design process, management, data collection methods, property law, user focus, economic development, professional development
Topics: Legal Issues, Research Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Geographical Context, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here