Gabai, D S; Haronian, E; Sacks, R; Kennard, N S; Wong, N; Miera, M K and Cloyd, T D (2026) Doubling throughput and halving project durations: Lessons from intel's ocf strategy for project portfolio management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(2): 04025256, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Effective project portfolio management strategies are critical for managing complex projects across various industries and organizations. The optimized cycle-time flow (OCF) strategy was designed within Intel to predictably reduce project cycle times and increase throughput for complex installation, deinstallation, and design projects in industrial plants. Built on seven principles, it aims to enhance strategic alignment and optimize collaborative planning and execution. This study examines the implementation of OCF across multiple case studies within the construction of two of Intel's semiconductor fabrication plants, saving hundreds of millions of dollars that would have been wasted by traditional acceleration actions and halving the time to market for new technologies. Results from implementation on 642 installation projects, 503 deinstallation projects, and 335 design projects showed cycle-time reductions of up to 49%, 43%, and 41%, respectively. Effective and committed leadership was critical in scaling up implementation. The results highlight the effectiveness of OCF in diverse project environments, demonstrating its capability to streamline project execution and improve overall efficiency.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | case study, new technology, efficiency, portfolio management, scaling, acceleration, fabrication, duration, implementation, complex project, effectiveness, strategy, collaborative planning, semiconductor, time reduction |
| Subjects: | urban planning, innovation and technology management, contractual arrangements, strategic project management, economic analysis, organization, manufacturing engineering, electrical systems, data collection methods, project controls, management, performance management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Time Control, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here