Qi, L; Zhai, H and Shuang, Q (2026) Attention-driven multiobject tracking for proactive fall safety management in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(5): 04026052, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Falls from height remain a critical safety challenge in the construction industry, where vision-based monitoring systems must balance accuracy, efficiency, and reliability. This study proposes and validates an end-to-end framework for proactive fall prevention that directly addresses this trade-off. First, the framework introduces an efficiency-aware detector, You Only Look Once version 8s for Construction Worker Safety (YOLOv8s-CWS), with targeted architectural enhancements to improve accuracy on small and occluded workers. Second, it establishes a synergistic design where this high-precision detector is paired with the motion-centric ByteTrack algorithm to achieve reliable identity tracking amidst the visual clutter of dynamic construction sites. Finally, it incorporates a validated, building-information-modeling-agnostic method for real-time hazard judgment, enabling safety personnel to define unprotected edges and openings directly on a live video feed. System performance was validated on challenging construction site video sequences. The proposed YOLOv8s-CWS detector achieved a mean average precision of 83.7%, a +1.5% point improvement over its baseline, while operating at 142.7 frames per second. This enhanced detection directly mitigated tracking failures, boosting the system's identity F1 score to 75.32%, for a +7.85 point gain over the baseline configuration. Field deployments confirmed the framework's effectiveness in delivering robust, real-time intrusion alerts. This study provides a computationally efficient and validated solution for proactive safety monitoring, offering a practical tool to mitigate fall-related risks on construction sites.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | computer vision; construction safety; deep learning; fall risk; multiobject tracking; you only look once |
| Index terms: | construction safety, safety management, configuration, construction site, accuracy, personnel, computer vision, construction worker, construction industry, prevention, modelling, monitoring, identity, effectiveness, deep learning, falls, efficiency, judgment |
| Subjects: | financial risk, computer vision, practitioner, analytical methods, professional development, performance management, management, health risk and incident analysis, systems engineering, environmental health, industry analysis, sociology, occupational health and safety management, dispute resolution, control systems, artificial intelligence, work location |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Site Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here