He, S; Li, J; Li, M and Antwi-Afari, M F (2026) Modeling and analyzing workers' hazard perception in construction equipment operations: A hierarchical Bayesian cognitive modeling approach integrating multisource data. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(5): 04026054, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Hazard perception is essential for workers engaged in continuous construction equipment operations within dynamic, complex environments. Existing research lacks a comprehensive understanding of how internal and external factors, along with a series of cognitive processes, shape the uncertainty of hazard perception. Consequently, there is limited insight into hazard perception performance and associated error risks among different workers in various task situations. This study proposes a hierarchical Bayesian cognitive modeling approach integrating multisource data to explore the cognitive mechanisms underlying workers' hazard perception and quantify corresponding errors. A cognitive model represents how workers perceive and respond to hazards, whereas a hierarchical Bayesian model quantifies multilevel dependencies between cognitive characteristics and hazard perception outcomes. The proposed modeling approach incorporates mental fatigue and individual differences through hierarchical priors that distinguish task temporal variations and worker-specific traits. The Markov chain Monte Carlo method estimates posterior distributions of cognitive parameters, capturing the uncertainty in hazard perception. The data from a behavioral experiment demonstrated the feasibility of the approach. The results confirmed that hazard perception is a continuous, intricate cognitive process and revealed that relevant cognitive parameters are significantly influenced by mental fatigue and individual differences. The approach integrates multisource data, captures time-varying cognitive uncertainties, and examines key factors affecting hazard perception. This method exhibits strong potential for real-time identification and prediction of hazard perception errors across different workers, ultimately enhancing targeted management of workers' hazard perception performance in intricate construction equipment operations, improving safety management judgments, and mitigating risks.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cognitive model; construction worker; hazard perception; hierarchical Bayesian modeling; multisource data |
| Index terms: | fatigue, experiment, temporal variation, safety management, construction equipment, judgment, Markov chain, modelling, estimate, construction worker |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, dispute resolution, health conditions and diseases, project controls, occupational health and safety management, construction equipment, analytical methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Time Control, Roles and Professions, Plant and Equipment, Cost Management, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here