Alsyouf, L; Al Harbat, R; Ma'bdeh, S N and Mushtaha, E S N (2026) Economic feasibility of low-impact retrofit strategies for enhancing energy efficiency in residential townhouses: A case study of sharjah. Construction Economics and Building, 26(1), ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Improving the energy efficiency of buildings has become a critical priority, particularly in hot–humid climates where cooling demands are exceptionally high. Hence, due to buildings being considered one of the biggest contributors to energy consumption, utilizing feasible retrofitting strategies is critical. This study assessed the impact of three retrofitting strategies—enhanced glazing, enhanced roof insulation, and reflective cooling paint on exterior walls—on the cooling load, energy consumption, and economic feasibility of a residential townhouse in hot–humid climates in Sharjah. The methodology involved simulating various retrofitting scenarios using DesignBuilder to assess their impact on energy consumption and cooling load, followed by an economic analysis to evaluate feasibility in terms of cost, energy savings, and payback periods. It was found that using reflective paint achieved the highest reductions in energy consumption (8%) and cooling load (13%), while combining reflective paint with glazing upgrades offered up to 10% energy savings and 16% cooling load reduction. These results highlight that reflective paints and their combinations with other strategies provide a cost-effective and energy-efficient solution for retrofitting older buildings in hot–humid climates, making them a sustainable choice for reducing energy demand and promoting thermal comfort. The findings offer practical insights for replicable interventions in similar hot–humid urban contexts and contribute to the regional transition toward nearly net-zero energy buildings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design; cost analysis; energy performance; retrofitting strategies; sustainability |
| Index terms: | thermal comfort, energy consumption, energy-saving, insulation, humid climate, roof, energy performance, case study, energy demand, energy efficiency, building design, net-zero energy building, glazing, payback, methodology, economic analysis, retrofit strategy, retrofitting, cost analysis, strategy |
| Subjects: | climate science, design analysis, architectural design, economic analysis, architectural elements, research methods, sustainable design, data collection methods, sustainability and energy, building materials, energy systems, financial and cost management, design practice, management, renovation and retrofit, environmental engineering |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here