Li, B; Huang, Y; Lim, H W; Wang, L and Fang, D (2026) How foreman safety leadership influences worker safety behavior: An empirical study from a developmental psychology perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(2): 04025254, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In recent years, the construction industry in China has witnessed a persistently high death toll, and human unsafe behavior is the main cause of accidents. Foremen, as key frontline managers on construction sites, play a critical role in enhancing workers' safety behavior through effective safety leadership. However, workers' psychological willingness to improve safety behavior is often restricted by negative social relationships and unhealthy interaction patterns caused by foreman's safety leadership. This study aims to investigate worker-foreman interactions from the perspective of developmental psychology and provide novel insights into the psychological mechanisms through which safety leadership influences safety behavior. Empirical studies were conducted on multiple construction projects, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed with 513 valid responses to examine the relationships between foreman safety leadership, worker-foreman attachment, and worker safety behavior. The results revealed that foreman safety leadership, including leading by example, participative decision-making, informing, and showing concern, significantly reduced workers' attachment avoidance. Attachment avoidance served as a mediating variable, negatively impacting workers' safety behavior. The effect of attachment anxiety was found to be nonsignificant in the model. Based on these findings, this paper offers valuable insights into the underlying causes of workers' behavior choices and the mechanism of safety leadership from an individual psychological standpoint, highlighting the importance of integrating psychological and behavioral theories to assess the interpersonal relationship quality in safety management practice across the globe. This study shifts the perspective of safety leadership and behavior studies from a macrolevel approach to a microlevel perspective, providing practical suggestions for integrating attachment theory into safety assessment and developing targeted safety leadership interventions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | attachment; construction industry; construction team; safety behavior; safety leadership; structural equation modeling |
| Index terms: | construction team, safety behaviour, empirical study, interpersonal relationship, construction industry, interaction, manager, unsafe behaviour, safety leadership, structural equation modelling, construction site, toll, construction project, decision-making, anxiety, psychology, safety management, China |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, decision analysis, industry analysis, statistical analysis, work location, project delivery, mental health and wellbeing, behavioral psychology, transportation engineering, research methods, Geography, health safety and environment, production management, financial risk, practitioner |
| Topics: | Site Management, Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here