Liu, W; Chan, A P C; Debrah, C and Darko, A (2026) Evaluating project success for emergency healthcare infrastructure based on the cloud matter-element model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(5): 04026038, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In response to large-scale health crises, emergency healthcare infrastructure projects (EHIPs) have been implemented to provide healthcare services rapidly. However, few studies have systematically explored the success of these projects. This study aims to assess the success of EHIPs throughout the whole life cycle using a cloud matter-element model (CMEM). Considering multiple performance indicators that measure the success of EHIPs, a hierarchy model of the project success index is proposed through eight rounds of Delphi surveys. This model comprises 10 key performance indicators (KPIs) that are most appropriate for measuring the success of EHIPs and 20 quantitative metrics aligned with these KPIs across the life cycle. Based on the hierarchy model, the CMEM is applied to evaluate the success of EHIPs, which effectively addresses the fuzziness and randomness inherent in the Delphi process. Two cases were then utilized for verifying the practicality of the proposed project success assessment model. The findings demonstrate that the CMEM-based assessment offers not only significant flexibility but also high accuracy, robustness, and scalability. The CMEM-based assessment seamlessly integrates numerous incompatible indexes and their characteristic values, without being limited by the number of evaluation indexes. Further, sensitivity analyses are conducted to test the robustness of the assessment model and its results. These analyses confirmed that the CMEM is a robust, reliable, and adaptable tool for assessing the success of EHIPs. Theoretically, this study should set an exemplar of aggregating the performance measurement with emergency management and healthcare systems, facilitating an efficient response to major crises. It also provides a novel approach to evaluating multiple-criteria decision-making problems. Practically, this study should enable project management teams to identify and improve weak areas, ensuring continuous success in the EHIP-related domain.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cloud matter-element model; emergency healthcare infrastructure projects; key performance indicators; large-scale health crises; project success; quantitative metrics; whole life cycle |
| Index terms: | infrastructure project, whole life cycle, Delphi survey, project success, key performance indicator, performance measurement, life cycle, emergency management, decision-making, sensitivity analysis, performance indicator, accuracy, project management team |
| Subjects: | sustainability assessment, financial risk, environmental hazards, performance measurement, performance management, professional development, project management theory and practice, decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, data collection methods, profession, value management, project delivery |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here