Data sharing mechanism among intelligent transportation infrastructure stakeholders: Based on the data value chain perspective

Liu, J; Jin, T; Pan, Y and Li, Y (2026) Data sharing mechanism among intelligent transportation infrastructure stakeholders: Based on the data value chain perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(2): 04025240, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In the context of digital economy, intelligent transportation infrastructure (ITI) as an important node of the intelligent transportation system (ITS) is of great significance in accelerating the high-quality construction of smart cities. However, due to the privacy concerns of all stakeholders, it is difficult to balance the benefits and risks associated with the flow of data resources. Previous research has not provided a clear solution to the data sharing dilemma of ITI. Thus, based on the data value chain theory, this paper constructed a tripartite evolutionary game model involving the users, the owners, and the governments. Subsequently, the evolutionarily stable strategies and corresponding conditions of each participant were examined, and the critical factors on stakeholder decision-making were discussed using numerical simulation analysis. The results show that (1) building a harmonious and unified data-sharing environment is the consensus of all stakeholders, without interference from the initial strategy; (2) the changes in benefits and the learning costs have a more significant impact on user decisions than the loss changes; (3) on the contrary, the owners are more sensitive to the additional costs of facilitating data sharing than to the value it brought; (4) for governments, imposing penalties is a more effective way to promote data security than offering subsidies. This paper can not only promote the relevant research of ITI, but also provide an important reference for governments to promote data sharing and the development of digital economy.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: penalty, strategy, privacy, decision-making, subsidy, value chain, critical factor, numerical simulation, smart city, owner, transportation infrastructure, evolutionary game
Subjects: professional ethics, economic analysis, management, value chain strategy, sociology, decision analysis, regulatory law, infrastructure and transport systems, economic theory, risk assessment, urban sustainability, modelling and simulation
Topics: Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Supply Chain Management, Legal Issues, Risk Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here