Navigating BIM technological innovations for megaprojects: Insights from the toce framework

Guo, Z; Wang, Q; Cao, X and Wang, Z (2026) Navigating BIM technological innovations for megaprojects: Insights from the toce framework. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(1): 04025235, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In the context of digital transformation, building information modeling technological innovation (BIM-TI) has emerged as a critical element in enhancing design integration, data analysis, and intelligent construction processes. While technologies such as digital twins, big data, and the internet of things have evolved alongside BIM, BIM-TI refers to the innovation of BIM within the broader context of digital transformation. Although previous research focused on isolated influencing factors or general adoption frameworks, a lack of clarity remained regarding the key drivers and their interaction, especially in megaprojects. This study aimed to examine the factors influencing BIM-TI in megaprojects and to identify the configurations. The objective was to establish a comprehensive framework for understanding the mechanisms driving BIM-TI. To address this knowledge gap, the technological conditions, organizational capabilities, construction scenarios, environmental pressures (TOCE) framework was developed by introducing construction scenarios as a fourth dimension, as an extension of the traditional technology-organization-environment (TOE) model. It reflects the practical contexts in which BIM has been applied, including collaborative design, intelligent manufacturing, intelligent site, intelligent operation, and green construction. This study explored the influencing and configurational paths of BIM-TI using structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The findings indicated that technological conditions, organizational capabilities, construction scenarios, and environmental pressures were key drivers of BIM-TI, with environmental pressures playing a moderating role. Four distinct configurational paths were identified, highlighting the core role of environmental pressures and their synergistic effects with either technological conditions or organizational capabilities. This study enriches the theoretical foundation by extending the TOE model to the TOCE framework and provides a novel configuration for BIM-TI mechanisms in megaprojects. These insights offered practical guidance for project managers and engineers, industry leaders and technology providers, and policymakers to foster BIM-TI.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modeling (BIM) technological innovation; configurational analysis; construction scenarios; environmental pressures (toce) framework; key drivers; megaprojects management; organizational capabilities; technological conditions
Index terms: influencing factor, building information modelling, project manager, engineer, transformation, technological innovation, internet, interaction, dimension, data analysis, big data, qualitative comparative analysis, structural equation modelling, construction process, integration, configuration, digital twin, collaborative design, organizational capability, megaproject
Subjects: statistical analysis, systems engineering, information systems, organizational analysis, sociology, data analysis and analytics, health monitoring assessment and metrics, design methods, computing systems, risk assessment, profession, business, behavioral psychology, building construction, research methods, innovation and technology management, strategic project management, digital engineering
Topics: Health and Safety, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here