Cross-industry innovation: Exploring the dynamics of an innovation network in construction

Happalad, M M; Bosch Sijtsema, P M; Claeson Jonsson, C and Sundquist, V (2026) Cross-industry innovation: Exploring the dynamics of an innovation network in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 44(3), pp. 183-199. ISSN 0144-6193

Abstract

Innovation in construction is a complex, collaborative effort. While inter-organizational collaboration is essential for overcoming project-based constraints, cross-industry collaboration necessitates knowledge and resources from technically proficient organizations to co-create innovative solutions tailored to construction needs. This paper explores how a collaborative innovation network evolves across industrial actors involving the construction industry and the automotive industry. Using the Industrial Network Approach (INA), this study explores the dynamics of an innovation process for co-creating a digital application called the "Efficient Load Out", which tracks and optimizes truck loads. Data was collected through 16 semi-structured interviews with the main contractor, subcontractors, and a truck group conglomerate. The results show that the dynamic nature of network interdependencies in cross-industry innovation calls for various features of interaction among the actors in efforts of combining resources and linking activities. The interaction among actors evolve, organizational interfaces and actor roles shift across the initiation, development, pilot, and scale-up phases of the innovation process. The study contributes by showing insights into the dynamic features of context dependency in a cross-industry innovation network, including how an innovation plays out differently for the actors, both on short-term and long-term basis.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: collaboration; cross-industry innovation; industrial network approach; interaction; interdependency
Index terms: subcontractor, construction innovation, collaboration, interview, interaction, construction industry, dynamics, automotive industry, main contractor
Subjects: data collection methods, systems engineering, industry analysis, management, practitioner, behavioral psychology, building construction
Topics: Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here