Dogan, Y O; Arditi, D and Irlayıcı Cakmak, P (2026) Corporate universities in building construction companies: Evidence from the u.S. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 22(1), pp. 96-118. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Managing a company's knowledge assets and creating sustainable learning environments are more important than ever in managing change, surviving, competing, and thriving in a knowledge economy. A corporate university (CU), "a unique form of educational arrangement to accomplish an organization's goals by building the intellectual capital of its employees," is one of the tools that companies use to overcome these challenges. Although there have been some attempts to establish and operate CUs in some construction companies, the CU concept has rarely been investigated in academic research associated with the construction industry. This paper examines the current situation of CUs in American building construction companies. To assess the current situation, an Internet search was conducted to visit and analyze the content of the websites of building construction companies listed in Engineering News-Record (ENR)'s Top 400 Contractors list. The results show that 102 out of the largest 323 building construction companies in the U.S. offer in-house education/training activities, 40 of which describe themselves as CUs. There is a significant drop in the number of companies with in-house education/training activities from the first 100 to the last 100 companies. In addition, the results provide valuable insights into some of the key building blocks of CUs, namely content/course offerings, programs, target audience, delivery methods, collaboration, outsourcing, and accreditation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building construction company; construction management; corporate university; training |
| Index terms: | construction industry, internet, delivery method, outsourcing, program, collaboration, evidence, building construction, construction company |
| Subjects: | software systems, management, delivery method, industry analysis, business, computing systems, building construction, organization, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here