Ning, X and Tang, Y (2026) Unraveling the evolution of collaborative innovation networks in megaprojects: Evidence from China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(5): 04026047, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Megaprojects with increasing scale and complexity necessitate collaborative innovation, which is marked by dynamic evolution. Networks are an effective technique for analyzing interorganizational interactions, yet few studies have explored the complex mechanisms driving the evolution of collaborative innovation networks (CINs) in megaprojects. This study constructed a CIN by longitudinally tracking patents from the Derwent Innovation Index database. Social network analysis and network motif analysis were employed to capture the evolutionary characteristics, and the stochastic actor-oriented model was introduced to identify the underlying driving forces behind the evolution. Our results corroborated that the CIN exhibited scale-free characteristics, evolving from star-centralized to connected-distributed structures. Triadic closure facilitated the evolution of collaborative innovation. Similar innovation abilities and experiences fostered collaboration, whereas similar innovation influences exerted a negative impact. Geographical, cognitive, and organizational proximity all acted as drivers; however, institutional proximity was not significant. These findings further deepen our understanding of the dynamics of collaboration innovation in megaprojects and offer valuable insights for formulating strategies to enhance interorganizational collaboration.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaborative innovation network; megaprojects; network dynamics; network motif analysis; social network analysis; stochastic actor-oriented model |
| Index terms: | complexity, evolution, interorganizational, dynamics, strategy, megaproject, interaction, collaboration, China, database, social network analysis, evidence |
| Subjects: | Geography, research methods, business, environmental science, evaluation and assessment methods, management, data management, strategic project management, behavioral psychology, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Sustainability, Project Management, Geographical Context, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here