Gunathilaka, S; Wijesekara, D and Kwok, S F (2025) Project high-performance work system for enabling high-performing teams in construction. Construction Economics and Building, 25(3-4), pp. 43-64. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Modern construction organizations demand high-performing teams (HPTs) in their projects in order to face increasing performance challenges. On the one hand, they face significant performance challenges due to the competition in the industry in many forms, such as competitive bidding to receive projects. On the other hand, they need to manage the performance challenges posed by the complexities of the uncertain and volatile construction project environment to deliver projects successfully and build up strong organizational profiles to face such issues. At the same time, they must also follow the legislative requirements of their countries, which are focused on the big issues and challenges that exist in the contemporary construction industry. In order to enable HPTs, they need a high-performance work system (HPWS) that can facilitate their projects. However, although literature shows numerous studies on organizational HPWSs that consist of human resource management practices, only limited attention has been given to identifying such a system for the project context. This study aimed to fill this knowledge gap through a quantitative research study. The project high-performance work system (PHPWS) was conceptualized using literature and tested using 221 responses to a questionnaire survey among team members in construction projects. The exploratory factor and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to analyze data to conclude this PHPWS. The findings facilitate the construction organizations to create the PHPWS for enabling HPTs in their projects and constitute a significant original contribution to the theory and practice in the construction management research domain.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction projects; high-performing teams; human resource management; project high-performance work system; project team performance |
| Index terms: | construction organization, quantitative research, construction industry, project team, human resource management, face, survey, confirmatory factor analysis, management research, competitive bidding, complexity, construction project, competition, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | research design and methodology, data collection methods, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, management, systems engineering, statistical analysis, industry analysis, organization, psychology, bidding, production management, market analysis |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Human Resources, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here