Kim, S; Yaşar, M and Shahandashti, M (2025) The effects of disasters on construction wages: Role played by spatial proximity. Construction Economics and Building, 25(3-4), pp. 186-209. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Natural hazards significantly threaten the built environment and infrastructure, resulting in a sudden and significant increase in reconstruction demand. Such an unforeseen post-disaster demand surge for reconstruction can inflate costs up to 50%, impeding prompt and efficient reconstruction efforts. The current study aimed to quantify the effect of disasters on construction wages in three Gulf Coast states (Louisiana, Texas, and Florida). To accomplish this, spatial Durbin models were utilized with a difference-in-differences specification to allow for feedback and spillover effects across counties. The results show that the impact of a disaster on construction wages works with a lag. Natural disasters caused a decrease in construction wages in the impacted counties during the disaster quarter, compared to counties that were not affected. However, construction wages increased one quarter later in the disaster-affected counties compared to the non-affected counties. The direct, indirect, and total effects of disasters on the counties' wages indicate significant feedback and spillover effects across counties when a county experiences a disaster. The findings of this study carry significant policy implications for the city's policymakers and decision-makers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction wages; demand surge; difference-in-differences; spatial durbin models; spatial multiple imputation |
| Index terms: | policy implication, specification, wages, natural disaster, reconstruction, natural hazard, built environment |
| Subjects: | business economics, environmental hazards, contractual condition, policy studies, building construction, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Sustainability, Contract Administration, Governance, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here