Toǧan, V; Sulub, A S; Eirgash, M A and Mostofi, F (2026) Project scheduling to minimize the time and cost in large-scale construction projects with repulsion-based improved arithmetic optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(3): 04025277, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Optimally balancing project duration and cost significantly enhances overall project value. Nevertheless, managing this dual-objective optimization becomes increasingly challenging as the number of activities and their associated execution modes expand in large-scale construction projects. Current optimization algorithms, although effective for smaller discrete time-cost trade-off problems (DTCTP), typically become entrapped in local optima, thus limiting their capability for exhaustive Pareto-front exploration when applied to larger DTCTP cases. The present study developed a repulsive arithmetic optimization algorithm (RAOA), explicitly formulated to overcome these constraints. RAOA capitalizes on a multiobjective optimization scheme integrated with a distinctive repulsion-based update mechanism to efficiently traverse extensive search spaces, avoid local optimal traps, and accelerate solution convergence. Empirical validation performed on scenarios involving 81, 146, 208, and 291 activities confirms RAOA's superior performance relative to current methodologies, revealing improvements of at most 0.20% closer proximity to known best solutions with computational efficiencies enhanced by at least 97%. Thus, RAOA provides an effective, scalable approach, furnishing construction managers with advanced optimization tools for proficient scheduling in large-scale project environments. This study contributes by extending recent DTCTP benchmarks through the introduction of RAOA, which outperforms prior heuristics like hybrid heuristic meta-heuristic (HHMH) and reduced computational demand, revealing RAOA's superior balance between exploitation and exploration. Collectively, the findings demonstrate that RAOA furnishes construction managers with a scalable, computationally efficient tool for generating better duration-cost trade-offs in large-scale scheduling environments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | arithmetic optimization algorithm; Pareto-front solution; project management; repulsion-based learning; scheduling; time-cost optimization |
| Index terms: | duration, project management, time-cost trade-off, efficiency, heuristic, exploitation, exploration, methodology, construction project, optimization algorithm, construction manager, validation, cost optimization, scheduling, project scheduling |
| Subjects: | environmental resource management, operations research, research methods, algorithms, production management, profession, risk assessment, project controls, management, quantity surveying, performance management, economics, professional development, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Time Control, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Quality Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here